Ken Tanzer <ken.tanzer@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Please don't do it. PGDG RPMs are designed for parallel installation >> (like 9.2 and 9.3 on the same machine), and then the pg_config in >> regular $PATH might be tricky. > It didn't seem like a great idea to me either, but what's the better > alternative? Without the symlink I get lots of errors: You should arrange for the appropriate pg_config to be in your PATH when you're using pgxs. Copying (or symlinking) pg_config into /usr/bin is a pretty horrible substitute for a temporary PATH change. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
