On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:09 AM, Achilleas Mantzios <achill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It is more mature than Linux for sure, but still not up to par with Solaris for some features. See this comment for example: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r27269032-. I do like FreeBSD very much, but it seems to me that if I want to use ZFS to its fullest, I should go with OpenIndiana.
In the benchmark you link, ZFS+opti (orange line, physical machine benchmark) performs well because it has sync=disabled, which is risky to say the least ...
On 16/01/2014 11:57, Sébastien Lorion wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Sébastien Lorion <sl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
Since ZFS on Linux (http://zfsonlinux.org/) has been declared production ready last March (v0.6.1), I am curious if anyone is using it with PostgreSQL on production servers (either main or backup) and if so, what is their experience so far ?
Thank you,
Sébastien
FYI, a recent (Sept. 2013) presentation I found about using ZoL in production (albeit, not with PostgreSQL) and the current status of the project:
-- Achilleas Mantzios Head of IT DEV IT DEPT Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
