On 12/20/2013 07:32 AM, Joseph Kregloh wrote:
Case B:
pg_upgrade -b /home/jkregloh/pg_bin/ -B /usr/local/bin/ -D
/usr/local/pgsql_93/data -d /usr/local/pgsql/data/ -P 5452 -p 5451
In this case, the OLD cluster is in the default location and the
new one
in /usr/local/pgsql_93/. This will complete successfully. HOWEVER in
/usr/local/pgsql/data I will be left with the PG_9.0 and PG_9.3
folders,
then the 9.3 cluster does not have access to any of this because
it's
install location is /usr/local/pgsql_93/data. I would either have to
copy all of the data over to the new /usr/local/pgsql_93/data or the
inverse. Which in any case would be pretty messy and error prone.
I am open to suggestions if anyone has any ideas of what to try.
At this point I am confused, so I will try to summarize the issue to
date and you can indicate whether I am correct or not
1) You are doing a test upgrade from 9.0 to 9.3 using pg_upgrade
2) You are using two BSD jails, one of which holds the 9.0 instance
and the other the 9.3 instance.
3) The upgrade is being run from the 9.3 jail against 9.0 /bin and
/data directories that are mounted in the 9.3 jail
4) Your original attempts failed because pg_upgrade is confused
about which directory to copy from/to
5) Your latest attempt sort of succeeded, but left you with both 9.0
and 9.3 data directories in /usr/local/pgsql/data which is supposed
to be the 9.0 /data.
Correct on all points above.
Now my questions:
1) Still on the case of the port numbers. In your first example port
5451 is associated with the 9.3 instance, in the second with the 9.0
instance and the reverse for port 5453. Is that really the case?
It should be 5452 for the old port. That was a copy/paste from one of my
first attempts. But the ports I am using are 5451 for 9.3 and 5452 for
9.0. Sorry about that confusion.
Great, one less moving part:)
2) Have you tried what has been suggested which is locating both
instances inside one jail directly, without the mount redirection?
Yes I have tried that with the same results.
Hmmm.
So was your latest attempt where you ended up with a doubled data/ in
the two or one jail scenario?
Can we see a directory listing for that case?
You say in the single jail case you got the same results. Which would
that be the failure, the double data/ or both ?
Thanks,
-Joseph
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:adrian.klaver@gmail.__com <mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxx>>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxx>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxx
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
