> >> postgresql-xc is not postgresql, its a fork. > > > It would at least merit being mentioned in the doc, just like other > > "forks" or whatever you may call it, as long as they're open-source. > > You seem to not realize how many forks of Postgres there are. I had mentioned just one. And that one does not only fill in a functionality gap that is pretty important when it comes to competition/advocacy vs. e.g. that database with the capital "O", but it is also mentioned already on postgresql.org. Honestly, don't try to tell me that the majority of the developers working on PostgreSQL are not aware of PostgreSQL-XC. > There's no way that we can even track them all, let alone cater > for them in our documentation. Just putting one single URL into the doc instead of the misleading statement that there's no such thing should have been less work than replying to me. >;-> Disclaimer: I have nothing to do with PostgreSQL-XC, I don't even use it myself, I just happen to know that it exists, even though I am just a "casual" user of PostgreSQL. Sincerely, Wolfgang -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
