Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Q: regarding backends

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2013/12/10 Stephan Fabel <sfabel@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi all,
>
> and sorry if I'm asking a question that has been answered before; has the
> PostgreSQL community ever considered different key/value backends (sort of like
> MySQL with its many different options)?
>
> We'd be very interested in seeing the effects of integrating LMDB [*] in terms
> of performance gains. Has this avenue been explored before?

There was talk of pluggable storage at this year's PGCon (PGUncon?):

  https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/2013UnconfPluggableStorage

but even if the idea gains traction, it's not going to arrive any time soon.

As Kevin mentions, FDWs might provide a good alternative. An example
with key/value stores I've been citing recently is this one:

  http://blog.cloudflare.com/kyoto_tycoon_with_postgresql


Regards

Ian Barwick


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux