On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 02:36:08PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > > Karsten Hilbert wrote: > > > Let me try to rephrase: > > > > > > Fact: pg_upgrade can NOT properly upgrade clusters which contain > > > databases that are set to "default_transaction_read_only on" > > > > > > Question: Is this intended ? > > > > I am pretty sure that this is an oversight and hence a bug. > > oversight, yes ... I thought as much and was therefore a bit > cautious of calling it a bug, chose to name it "?deficiency" ;-) Well, pg_upgrade can't handle every possible configuration. How do we even restore into such a database? You marked the database as read-only, and pg_upgrade is going to honor that and not modify it. I believe a pg_dumpall restore might fail in the same way. You need to change the default on the old cluster before upgrading. It is overly cumbersome to set the default_transaction_read_only for every database connection, and there are many other settings that might also cause failures. If it was a silent failure, I would be more concerned. What you might be able to do is to set PGOPTIONS to "-c default_transaction_read_only=false" and run pg_upgrade. If more people report this problem, I could document this work-around. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
