On 11/11/13, 1:33 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > The analyzer is reporting some findings, and some of the findings look > legitimate. We have been tracking clang scan-build results for some time, and fixed quite a few of them. Most of the remaining ones are false positives. Maybe there are still a few that could be fixed, but certainly scan-build is not suitable as an acceptance test of the PostgreSQL source at this point. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
