On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Andres Freund <andres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2013-10-24 18:40:46 +0900, Amit Langote wrote: >> While going through the documentation for GIN fast update technique, I read - >> >> "...or if the pending list becomes too large (larger than work_mem), >> the entries are moved to the main GIN data structure using the same >> bulk insert techniques used during initial index creation." >> >> The "work_mem" links to work_mem setting documentation. >> >> Whereas in the src/backend/access/gin/README, as one of the features >> of GIN, I read - >> >> "...* Optimized index creation (Makes use of maintenance_work_mem to accumulate >> postings in memory.)" >> >> So, which one is it - work_mem or maintenance_work_mem? >> >> Or are these things unrelated? > > Yes. One is about the initial index creation, the other about insertions > into an existing index. > > Greetings, > Hmm, okay. So, work_mem allocations are also involved in case of GIN index updates (if FASTUPDATE is on)? Thanks. -- Amit -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general