Evan Jones wrote: > I *know* that without an ORDER BY clause, the database is free to > reorder results in any way it likes. However, I recently ran into a > case where the *SAME* query was returning results in a different order > *within* a single transaction, which surprised me (we fixed it by > adding the missing ORDER BY). I would assume that once a transaction > obtains a snapshot, all its read operations would return the same > results. Yes, the same results -- not necessarily in the same order. For instance, a synchronized scan might start at a different point of the table. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
