On 10/02/2013 05:58 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:48:02AM +0000, Albe Laurenz wrote:
Or does that still need some C sprinkling (for operator support, say) ?
Exactly. If you want "<" to work right for this data type
that's the road you have to go.
I see.
Whatever became of the 2011 intent to implement
the above that's linked to in the blog post ?
Not sure about that, but I do remember this:
http://svana.org/kleptog/pgsql/taggedtypes.html
No indication of whether it will work with 9.x servers though.
Karsten
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxx
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
