On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Michael Nolan <htfoot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not a bad idea, but in this case, a small amount of downtime is preferable over going to that level of effort.
Have you considered setting up a synchronously replicated slave database on the new file system (using a port other than 5432), getting it in sync, then shutting both databases down (master first), switching the slave over to become the master and restarting just that database on port 5432?
Not a bad idea, but in this case, a small amount of downtime is preferable over going to that level of effort.
Moshe Jacobson
Nead Werx, Inc. | Manager of Systems Engineering
Nead Werx, Inc. | Manager of Systems Engineering
2323 Cumberland Parkway, Suite 201 | Atlanta, GA 30339
moshe@xxxxxxxxxxxx | www.neadwerx.com
moshe@xxxxxxxxxxxx | www.neadwerx.com
"Quality is not an act, it is a habit." -- Aristotle
