Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Patrick Dung <patrick_dkt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Ivan Voras <ivoras@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL

* Patrick Dung (patrick_dkt@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>> The problem of pg_upgrade is that it needed to hold two set of databases data in the server.

>What?  That's absolutely *not* required for pg_upgrade to work.  In
>general, I would recommend that you make a copy of the database, but
>it's certainly not required.

I mean the old version and new version would need to take up disk space on the server.
Thus roughly doubled the disk space used.

Thanks,
Patrick



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux