Oliver Kohll - Mailing Lists wrote
> select regexp_replace(sentence,'\*(.*?)\*','' || upper('\1'),'g') from
> sentences;
Yeah, you cannot embed a function-call result in the "replace with" section;
it has to be a literal (with the group insertion meta-sequences allowed of
course).
I see two possible approaches.
1) Use pl/perl (or some variant thereof) which has facilities to do just
this.
2) Use regexp_matches(,,'g') to explode the input string into its components
parts. You can explode it so every character of the original string is in
the output with the different columns containing the "raw" and "to modify"
parts of each match. This would be done in a sub-query and then in the
parent query you would "string_agg(...)" the matches back together while
manipulating the columns needed "i.e., string_agg(c1 || upper(c3))"
HTH
David J.
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Making-substrings-uppercase-tp5770096p5770108.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
