Search Postgresql Archives

Re: postgres 9.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/27/2013 02:26 PM, pg noob wrote:

Hi all,

I recently ran a couple of tests where I took one of my production
systems and did a drop-in replacement of postgres 8.4 with 9.2.4.
I was expecting to see some performance improvement given the release
notes describing 9.2 as a "largely performance related release".

At least for my application, which is an embedded postgresql install
with a relatively small number of client connections, I'm not seeing much
of a measurable difference at all.

I'm just wondering if others have had a similar experience where upgrading
from 8.x to 9.x has or has not improved overall performance?

It would be easier to answer if you gave some information on what performance you are measuring and what the results are? Also remember there is an overhead incurred for all operations and for small installations it is a bigger part of the total cost, so you will not really gain on that.


Thanks.


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxx


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux