Moshe Jacobson <moshe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Well, I think you did it wrong, or else you're using a PG version that
>> predates some necessary fix, because it works for me.
> Sorry for the delayed response. I am using postgres 9.1.4 with pg_dump of
> the same version.
Ah. I think that you are missing this 9.1.7 fix:
commit 5110a96992e508b220a7a6ab303b0501c4237b4a
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Oct 26 12:12:53 2012 -0400
In pg_dump, dump SEQUENCE SET items in the data not pre-data section.
Represent a sequence's current value as a separate TableDataInfo dumpable
object, so that it can be dumped within the data section of the archive
rather than in pre-data. This fixes an undesirable inconsistency between
the meanings of "--data-only" and "--section=data", and also fixes dumping
of sequences that are marked as extension configuration tables, as per a
report from Marko Kreen back in July. The main cost is that we do one more
SQL query per sequence, but that's probably not very meaningful in most
databases.
Back-patch to 9.1, since it has the extension configuration issue even
though not the --section switch.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
