Search Postgresql Archives

Re: setting high value for wal_keep_segments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yeah, I already set it like that and it works.
Thanks.


On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:59 AM, bricklen <bricklen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 6:23 AM, AI Rumman <rummandba@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

I am going to sync slave with my master which is almost 500 G. I am not using archive directory instead of I am using wal files for streaming. As it may take almost 3 hours, I am thinking of setting up 400 for wal_keep_segments where I have enough space available.

Without the space issue, could there be any other problem in setting up such high value for "wal_keep_segments"? As this is production, I need to confirmed.

Another data point: I set up SR on two systems recently in production with the wal_keep_segments set to 10000 (lots of logs were being generated), and the slaves were about 1TB each. No problems were experienced.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux