On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Granthana Biswas <granthana.biswas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thank you for your reply. Have you implemented this while sharding your > database? Did it cause any performance issues? I used it for just several mission critical featured in one project, not widely. What about performance issues - it could cause ones, mostly if somebody forget to do commit/rollback as it still holds locks. Moreover it involves application<->DBs communications and persistence, so it is surely might affect performance. > > Warm regards, > GB > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Sergey Konoplev <gray.ru@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Granthana Biswas >> <granthana.biswas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Inspite of being aware that PLPROXY does autocommit for DML functions >> > called >> > on shards, I was wondering if there is any way around to put a set of >> > DML >> > functions called from Router on shards inside a transaction so that all >> > updates on shards can be rolled back if any one among the set fails? >> >> It is called two-phase commit. You need to consult with this [1] >> section of documentation. >> >> [1] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-prepare-transaction.html >> >> >> -- >> Kind regards, >> Sergey Konoplev >> PostgreSQL Consultant and DBA >> >> Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp >> Phone: USA +1 (415) 867-9984, Russia +7 (901) 903-0499, +7 (988) 888-1979 >> Skype: gray-hemp >> Jabber: gray.ru@xxxxxxxxx > > -- Kind regards, Sergey Konoplev PostgreSQL Consultant and DBA Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp Phone: USA +1 (415) 867-9984, Russia +7 (901) 903-0499, +7 (988) 888-1979 Skype: gray-hemp Jabber: gray.ru@xxxxxxxxx -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
