On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:30:22PM +0530, Amit Langote wrote: > >> Increasing the wal_keep_segments ? > > I know that I can increase wal_keep_segments to "solve" it, but > > shouldn't it be *impossible* to happen with synchronous replication? > > After all - all commits should wait for slave to be 100% up to date! > Is it possible that xlog recycling might have caused this wherein the > xlog segment which is yet to be archived/shipped is recycled? I As far as I know, pg will not recycle log before it's archived. Otherwise we wouldn't be able to have archives. > remember something of that sort. Check this discussion: > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51779B3B.1020003@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Is this logged on the master or a standby? master. Best regards, depesz -- The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it. http://depesz.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
