On 23 May 2013 10:15, Keith Fiske <keith@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Client reported an issue where it appears a foreign key has been violated > > prod=#\d rma_items > [snip] > rma_items_rma_id_status_fk" FOREIGN KEY (rma_id, rma_status) REFERENCES > rmas(id, status) ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE CASCADE > > prod=# select i.rma_id, i.rma_status, r.id, r.status from rmas r join > rma_items i on i.rma_id = r.id and i.rma_status != r.status; > rma_id | rma_status | id | status > ------------+------------+------------+-------- > 1008122437 | r | 1008122437 | c > (1 row) > > > Attempting to reinsert this data again causes a violation error, so it > doesn't appear to be broken > > prod=# begin; > BEGIN > prod=# insert into rma_items (rma_id, order_item_id, return_reason_id, > rma_status) values (1008122437, 1007674099, 9797623, 'r'); > ERROR: insert or update on table "rma_items" violates foreign key > constraint "rma_items_rma_id_status_fk" > DETAIL: Key (rma_id, rma_status)=(1008122437, r) is not present in table > "rmas". > prod=# rollback; > ROLLBACK > > This is running 9.2.4 on CentOS. If anyone can suggest how I can look into > this deeper and find what the problem may be, I'd appreciate it. I'm here at > PGCon if anyone is available to help IRL as well What do you get with: SELECT conname FROM pg_constraint WHERE NOT convalidated; -- Thom -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
