Hi, James. I'm a member of pg_bulkload developer community. Thank you for the bug report. Sorry to become late... We have released the new version of pg_bulkload , 3.1.3 where the reported bug is fixed. I hope this new version will help you. Regards. ++++++++++++ Takashi Ohnishi <onishi_takashi_d5@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-general-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fujii Masao Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 11:51 PM To: Tom Lane Cc: James Cowell; pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [Solved] Corrupt indexes on slave when using pg_bulkload on master On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > James Cowell <jcowell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> But pg_bulkload only puts the index updates into WAL if you also have >> >> archive_mode = on >> >> I guess it needs to test wal_level rather than archive mode now? It looks like changes to the project have been minimal for some time, which is a shame because it's a very useful tool. > > Oh, the code in question is in pg_bulkload not the backend? Yeah, it > sounds like it hasn't tracked some core-code changes. In particular > you might point the author at > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=40f9 > 08bdcdc726fc11912cd95dfd2f89603d1f37#patch10 > which shows how it needs to be done in 9.0 and later. I reported this problem to the author in offlist. Thanks for the bug report! Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
