Rob Sargent <robjsargent@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 03/18/2013 01:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Rob Sargent <robjsargent@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> On our 9.0.4[1] server my regexp_replace is a no-op, but on the 9.0.3[2] >>> test machine and my 9.1.2[3] dev box all is fine >> AFAICS from the commit logs, there were no changes affecting the regex >> code between 9.0.3 and 9.0.4. I'm suspicious that your data is >> different on the different servers. > Good to hear, thought I might have glossed over the telling release note > - my usual mo Maybe we're barking up the wrong tree by suspecting the regex itself. Perhaps the updates were suppressed by a trigger, or the transaction rolled back instead of committing, or some such? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
