Thanks a lot. I started the replication. It became very slow. It is taking long time to sync the masters data onto slave. Is there a way to find what's causing the issue?
Regards
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:06 PM, John Laing <john.laing@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm not sure about the existence of any standard scripts, but we have a pair of checks running periodically on the backup server.This shouldn't return anything:tail -3 /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-9.1-main.log | grep FATALAnd this should return something:ps -u postgres -o cmd | grep "postgres: wal receiver process streaming"
These have worked very reliably for many months.-JohnOn Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:53 AM, akp geek <akpgeek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I got it fixed.What I did was$ psql -c "SELECT pg_start_backup('label', true)" $ rsync -a ${PGDATA}/ standby:/srv/pgsql/standby/ --exclude postmaster.pid $ psql -c "SELECT pg_stop_backup()"It took a while a to catch up the data.One question I have , are there any scripts to monitor the status of the replciation. so that I can be little proactiveRegardsOn Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:What are you seeing in your slony and / or postgresql logs, if anything?On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:28 PM, akp geek <akpgeek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all -
>
> Recently made change on our primary database
>
> default_text_search_config = 'pg_catalog.simple' . After that
> the replication is stopped. Can you please help me ? how to fix the issue. I
> am sure I made the change on the slave also.
>
> How can I start the replication and catch up the data. Thanks for your time.