Daniel Farina <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This kind of change may have many practical problems that may > make it un-pragmatic to alter at this time (considering the > workaround is to set the extra float digits), but I can't quite > grasp the rationale for "well, the only program that cares about > the most precision available is pg_dump". It seems like most > programs would care just as much. Something to keep in mind is that when you store 0.01 into a double precision column, the precise value stored, when written in decimal, is: 0.01000000000000000020816681711721685132943093776702880859375 Of course, some values can't be precisely written in decimal with so few digits. -- Kevin Grittner EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
