Chris Angelico <rosuav@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> It's hard to muster much excitement about that when we've already >> got "numeric". > True, but I wasn't able (with 9.1, so that might have changed since) > to add inet to numeric. Maybe that would be easier? There's no such function today, but it could be added if anyone cared enough. > I don't think inet + inet is the right thing for this. Agreed, that doesn't seem very sensible --- it's a units failure, in some sense. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
