Search Postgresql Archives

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow a streaming replication standby to follow a timeline switc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15.12.2012 17:06, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
I might be missing something, but what exactly does that commit give us?

I mean - we were able, previously, to make slave switch to new master
- as Phil Sorber described in here:
http://philsorber.blogspot.com/2012/03/what-to-do-when-your-timeline-isnt.html

After some talk on IRC, I understood that this patch will make it
possible to switch to new master in plain SR replication, with no WAL
archive (because if you have wal archive, you can use the method Phil
described, which basically "just works").

Right, that's exactly the point of the patch. A WAL archive is no longer necessary for failover.

So I did setup three machines: master and two slaves.
Master had 2 IPs - its own, and a floating one.
Both slaves were connecting to the floating one, and recovery.conf
looked like:
---------
standby_mode = 'on'
primary_conninfo = 'port=5920 user=replication host=172.28.173.253'
trigger_file = '/tmp/finish.replication'
recovery_target_timeline='latest'
---------

After I verified that replication works to both slaves, I did failover one of
the slaves, shut down master, and did ip takeover of floating ip to the slave
that did takeover.

Hmm, is it possible that some WAL was generated in the old master, and streamed to the standby, after the new master was already promoted? It's important to kill the old master before promoting the new master. Otherwise the timelines diverge, so that you have some WAL on the old timeline that's not present in the new master, and some WAL in the new master's timeline that's not present in the old master. In that situation, if the standby has already replicated the WAL from the old master, it can no longer start to follow the new master. I think that would match the symptoms you're seeing.

I wouldn't rule out a bug in the patch either, though. Amit found a worrying number of bugs in his testing, and although we stamped out all the known bugs, it wouldn't surprise me if there's more :-(..

- Heikki


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux