Also, I can't 100% rule out that there won't be any long running (statistical) queries launched (even though such requests should not come to this database), which would occupy connection for longer time, but do not create any race condition... So having pool size at 8 may be too slim .
It's a single database.
-- Vlad
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If it was me, I would be starting with exactly 8 and be tuning from there.On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Vlad <marchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ok, understood.
> I need to give some more thoughts to if it's possible for us to switch to
> transaction mode from app standpoint of view.
>
> if yes, then setting pool size to 20 (for 8 cores) sounds OK?
Don't forget: each database role gets its own pool.
merlin