2012/11/23 Euler Taveira <euler@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 22-11-2012 04:27, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> 2012/11/21 Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: Separately, what are >> the objections to raising the size limit to 128? >> >>> significantly larger catalog >> > Less than 5% of catalog columns? I don't buy your argument. default 6201kB (64) updated 6967kB (128) on empty database - so it is 12% more per one database in our warehouses we have more than 100000 relations per database and about 1000 databases per warehouse - so these number can be significantly higher second issue can be increasing memory allocations for system caches and some other place Regards Pavel > > > -- > Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira http://www.timbira.com.br/ > PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
