On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Shaun Thomas <sthomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/20/2012 10:03 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote: > >> Shared buffer manipulation changing contention is suggesting you're >> running into free list lock issues. How many active backends/cores? > > > Oh, the reason I wanted to point it out was that we see a lot more than CPU > contention with higher shared_buffer settings. The scheduler starts > aggressively clearing out the file cache *and* freeing memory, driving load > way higher than it should be. That doesn't result in a very high iowait, but > all that page swapping sure isn't free. have you ruled out numa issues? (http://frosty-postgres.blogspot.com/2012/08/postgresql-numa-and-zone-reclaim-mode.html) merlin -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general