Pawel Veselov wrote: >> From your later comments, it's also apparent that these archived WALs will be useless after >> failover (for the purpose of recovery), so there is no reason to send them to all the nodes after all. > > I obviously lost it here. The archives do need to be synchronized, for the purpose of recovering > slaves. If a slave dies, and I want to recover it, it may need the archived WALs, and for this, the > archives should be available on the node. So, rsync (or something like that) is necessary. But it's a > bad idea to run the rsync from the archive command itself. Right, that's exactly what I tried to say. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
