Craig Ringer <ringerc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 10/22/2012 08:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> But having said that, are we sure 10 is SIGUSR1 on the OP's platform? >> AFAIK, that signal number is not at all compatible across different >> flavors of Unix. (I see SIGUSR1 is 30 on OS X for instance.) > Gah. I incorrectly though that POSIX specified signal *numbers*, not > just names. That does not appear to actually be the case. Thanks. This isn't the first time I've wondered exactly which signal was meant in a postmaster child-crash report. Seems like it might be worth expending some code on a symbolic translation, instead of just printing the number. That'd be easy enough (for common signal names) on Unix, but has anyone got a suggestion how we might do something useful on Windows? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
