On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Craig Ringer <ringerc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > BTW, the issue with the underlying question is that their "name" column is > unique. They expected to get a serialization failure on duplicate insert > into "name", not a unique constraint violation. The question wasn't "why > doesn't this fail" but "Why does this fail with a different error than I > expected". Not that the question made that particularly clear. Sounds to me like it's giving a better error anyway - more helpful to know _why_ the second transaction failed than to simply know _that_ it failed. I've actually never used serializable transaction isolation, preferring more explicit constraints. ChrisA -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
