Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Expensive log_line_prefix ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom Lane escribió:
> Sergey Konoplev <gray.ru@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Sahagian, David
> > <david.sahagian@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Are there any "extra" costs to logging all this cool stuff ?
> >> 
> >> log_line_prefix = '%m %a %u %p %c %m %v %x'
> 
> > The formatting cost only but it is so insignificant that does not
> > worth bothering with it.
> 
> IIRC, %m would imply a gettimeofday call, which might be expensive
> depending on your OS and hardware.  I think all the other info is
> "just sitting around", though.

Yeah, and having two %m means two gettimeofday calls.

Also, %c sort of implies %p, so having both is probably just a waste.

One other point is that it's probably a good idea to put in a %q in
there so that processes that don't have things like %v, %x don't have to
print a bunch of zeros (and also to prevent %a, %u from adding spaces
unnecessarily).

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux