Alan Nilsson wrote: > Is it the case that extensions can be added to only one schema? If so, what is the recommended > practice for accessing a function from an extension in multiple schemas? Yes, a (relocatable) extension can belong to only one schema. There are two ways to access the functions: 1) Use qualified names. 2) Set search_path to contain the schema. > Is it *ok* to load the extension in the pg_catalog schema so functions can be accessed by unqualified > names? Is it *better* to have a separate schema for functions and use qualified names to access? > What is the general accepted practice? No, that is not ok. pg_catalog is only for system objects. You should use schema "public" - that is in search_path by default, and everybody can use it. > As a side note: > ALTER EXTENSION foo ADD SCHEMA bar > What the heck does this do? AFICS, it has no effect on the visibility of an extension function in the > *added* schema. This makes "bar" belong to extension "foo", not the other way around. The effect is that a) "bar" will not be dumped by pg_dump b) "DROP EXTENSION foo" will drop schema "bar" Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
