Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Curosity question regarding "LOCK" NOWAIT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sep 22, 2012, at 0:08, John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 09/21/12 7:43 PM, David Johnston wrote:
>> Has there been any discussion regarding adding a time-limited version of NOWAIT, say: “WAITONLY 50” (milliseconds), when dealing the explicit LOCK TABLE or the SELECT…FOR(SHARE|UPDATE) commands?
> 
> is this a feature in any other major databases?

Doesn't matter to me...I'm only using PostgreSQL
> 
> is this in the sql spec?
> 

Guessing no if it is not implemented...

> what do you expect to happen if these timeouts expire? return an error, and abort the transaction?
> 

The same thing that happens if "NOWAIT" had been specified instead.

The goal is to specify that I don't mind waiting but only for a short period of time.

David J.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux