"Carrington, Matthew (Produban)" <Matthew.Carrington@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > As its AIX I don't have top but using topas and comparing it to other processes running a successful pg_dumpall doesn't get very large at all. Hmm. Best guess at this point is that there's some specific DDL in your database that confuses some recent change in pg_dump. Can you try to narrow down what it is? Try taking a pg_dump -s (schema only) from the cahoot_monitoring database, load parts of that into a scratch database, see if 9.2 pg_dump fails on that. Alternatively, if there's nothing terribly sensitive in your DDL, maybe you could send me the pg_dump -s output off-list? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
