Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Is there a way to use "pack" in pl/perl without resorting to pl/perlu?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks. I was hoping there was a way to enable individual operators through the postgresql configuration file or something.

Anyway, I replaced the functionality with $content =~ s/([a-fA-F0-9]{2})/chr(hex($1))/eg; which seems to be doing the same thing as unpack( "H*", $content ), which is basically what I needed for the time being. I suspect it's less efficient than unpack, and I hope the function I created won't be too slow for use inside a trigger.

Thanks,
Herouth

On 12/09/2012, at 17:47, Tom Lane wrote:

Herouth Maoz <herouth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
I created a function that does some heavy string manipulation, so I needed to use pl/perl rather than pl/pgsql.
I'm not experienced in perl, but the function works well when used as an independent perl subroutine - it depends only on its arguments. I use the Encode package (in postgresql configuration).

But my use of the "pack" function causes a Safe error. Apparently "pack" and "unpack" are in the operator mask.

Is there any way to remove them from that mask?

My recollection is that they're intentionally excluded because they
would otherwise be security holes --- there are some format codes that
allow direct access to memory, or something like that.

regards, tom lane


--
חרות מעוז
יוניסל פתרונות סלולריים מתקדמים
☎ 03-5181717 שלוחה 742


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux