On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Julian <tempura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > If you want guaranteed "consecutive" sequential numbering you have to > implement your own solution. I was brought to task by a number of people > about this (accountants). So its not a good idea to use a sequence for > things like invoice, receipt and other such accounting objects (not only > monetary), unless its somehow acceptable in your region. You can pretty > much duplicate the functionality of sequences as normal tables with the > benefit of them being transaction safe. > Be sure you are using it for reasons where its absolutely required. > For everything else a sequence does what its intended to do. > > Regards, > Julian > > P.S I have heard of people using a sequence in an AFTER trigger to generate > consecutive numbering to some success. But anything could happen. Yes what you basically do is use a sequence internally, where the user can't see it, and then either use an after trigger or lock the table for a very quick update to the column used for the row number after all your processing is done. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
