Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Feature discussion: Should syntax errors abort a transaction?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Em 20/06/2012 11:00, felix@xxxxxxxxxxx escreveu:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 06:36:09AM -0700, felix@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:25:24AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Edson Richter <edsonrichter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There is also the case of dynamically generated sql statements based on user selection... being syntax or not, I would never want half job done. Thia is the purpose of transactions: or all or nothing...
This this this, and again, this.  Imagine:

begin;
insert into tableb selcet * from tableb;
truncate tableb;
commit;

What should happen when we get to the error on the second line?  Keep
going?  Boom, data gone because of a syntax error.
I've been lurking, and maybe I should go back to that :-) but I think you misunderstand.  The idea is not to ignore or second-guess typoes, but to report them without affecting the transaction, and only do this in interactive sessions.

Personally, I like the idea of BEGIN INTERACTIVE, but note I do not offer to do the work.
Looks like I should go back to lurking, and do better at it :-(

The discussion began about differentiatng typoes and other errors, which is clearly not easy or obvious, and something that has always frustrated me when I find programs which try to do so.  Then I saw the idea of BEGIN INTERACTIVE and lost sight of the discussion.

My apoligies for stepping in so badly.

Don't be sorry, your question arrived a great discussion.

Nobody is mad about that, is just a matter to have great minds having great discussions!

Thansk for bringing that. Does not mean I agree with your point, but the debate is bigger than my personal opinion.

I'm certain that something good will arrive from this thread.

In time: I believe that "Begin Interactive" is not a good idea. Such behavior shall be built in the interface application, not in database backend... As I stated before, being tolerant or not, or trying to "guess" what user means is a task for the interface. The database must keep the "always safe, always good" policy with data.

Regards,

Edson.

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux