On 7.5.2012 00:56, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:37:47AM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 6.5.2012 20:47, Clemens Eisserer wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there a tool for checking a postgresql database for integrity, so I >>> would be notified immediatly if something went wrong e.g. with memory >>> and can go back to the last good backup? >>> Such a tool would guarantee me I am not sitting on a ticking time bomb >>> (corrupted database) without even noticing it. >> >> No, at least in the current version. The next version (9.2) will support >> checksums, but it's meant mostly as a protection against failures at the >> I/O level. It might catch some memory issues, but it certainly won't be >> 100% protection. > > Postgres 9.2 will _not_ support checksums. Oh, I see - it was bumped to 9.3 and I've missed that. Sorry for confusion. Tomas -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
