[ sorry for slow response ] Stephen Rees <srees@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Code that works on Pg8.3 raises an error on Pg9.1, is this a bug? Yes, it sure looks that way. Somebody decided they could mark userlocks as transactional, which was probably a bad idea altogether, and certainly wasn't followed up on adequately. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
