Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo.romano@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Why not using the implicit pg_temp_nnn as seen in views and tables? That's intentional, it was considered too much of a security risk to let temporary functions mask normal ones. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
