Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo.romano@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> As you can see, the third time I get a NOTICE message I don't get the >> first two times. >> Everything works fine but this strange thing... > There's a typo (extra create temporary view), Sorry, Hm, yeah, the first time would throw an error because pg_temp doesn't resolve, so if you're using DROP IF EXISTS there would be a visible difference in behavior between the two cases. I wonder if DROP IF EXISTS should consider non-existence of the specified schema (if any) as being a "not exists" case, and not throw an error for it. This isn't specific to the temp schema at all IMO. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
