I wrote: > You've still got a nasty join-size estimation error: >> -> Nested Loop (cost=6.18..1939.43 rows=411736 width=8) (actual >> time=0.203..3.487 rows=35 loops=1) > It's not apparent why that's so far off ... What PG version is this, anyway? It strikes me that this estimation error might have something with the eqjoinsel bugs that we repaired in 9.0.5. I'm not having any luck reproducing such a bogus estimate with current code, either, though that may just mean you've omitted some critical info about how the tables are set up. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
