On 02/03/12 01:25, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 28/02/2012 18:17, Rich Shepard wrote:On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, mgould@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:If we move to Linux, what is the preferred Linux for running Postgres on. This machine would be dedicated to the database only.Michael, There is no 'preferred' linux distribution; the flame wars on this topic died out a decade or so ago. From what you write, I would suggest that you look at one of the Ubunutus <http://www.ubuntu.org/>. Either the KDE or Gnome versions will appear Microsoft-like; the Xfce version appears more like CDE. Download a bootable .iso (a.k.a. 'live disk) and burn it to a cdrom and you can try it without .installing it. If you do like it, install it from the same disk. The Ubuntus boot directly into the GUI and that tends to be more comfortable for newly defenestrated users. If you like that, but want the more open and readily-available equivalent, install Debian. The ubuntus are derivatives of debian.One interesting thing I've discovered recently is that there is a HUGE difference in performance between CentOS 6.0 and Ubuntu Server 10.04 (LTS) in at least the memory allocator and possibly also multithreading libraries (in favour of CentOS). PostgreSQL shouldn't be particularly sensitive to either of these, but it makes me wonder what else is suboptimal in Ubuntu. I think if you are
going to select a member of the Debian family, I would strongly
recommend Debian itself. I have the impression that the Debian
community is more serious about quality than Canonical (the
company
behind Ubuntu). In a about a year I
will be setting up a server for a JBoss/PostgreSQL based
application. Currently I'm thinking of using either Centos (RHEL
if we get
sufficient budget) or Debian, but I will defer the actual decision
to
nearer the time. I use Fedora for my development box, and my
current
test server runs Ubuntu (not my choice, but I see no significant
reasons for changing it at the moment, though I'm tempted). Cheers, |