On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 08:37:54AM -0600, Andy Colson wrote: >> 3. WAL logging > > PG writes a transaction twice. Once to WAL and once to > the DB. WAL is a simple and quick write, and is only ever > used if your computer crashes and PG has to re-play > transactions to get the db into a good/known state. Its a > safety measure that doesn't really take much time, and I > don't think I've heard of anyone being WAL bound. Although > it does increase IO ops, it's not the biggest usage of IO. > This one falls under "lets be safe" which is something NoSQL > did away with. Its not something I want to give up, > personally. I like using a net. And, one could still effectively disable WAL by using unlogged tables. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
