Andy Chambers <achambers@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> Is it possible to use CREATE OPERATOR to make "&&" behave like "and"?
Hmm ... AND is not really an operator, but a primitive expression
construct. So I was about to say "no", but then it occurred to me
you could do something like (untested):
create function nonstandard_and(bool,bool) returns bool as
'select $1 and $2' language sql;
create operator && (procedure = nonstandard_and, leftarg = bool,
rightarg = bool);
This would be completely unworkable unless the implementation function
is an inline-able SQL function, because otherwise the planner will not
recognize that your && means AND, resulting in spectacularly bad
optimization. But with that, maybe you could get away with it.
I would not recommend it though, because you'll be paying through the
nose (inlining isn't a remarkably cheap operation) for what
fundamentally is gratuitously nonstandard, unportable SQL syntax with no
obvious redeeming value. The above hack is a cute hack, but it's just a
hack not something I'd recommend for production.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
