On Monday, January 30, 2012 7:39:13 am hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 07:34:49AM -0800, Adrian Klaver wrote: > > Breaks certain cases when using pg_dump -s. Some of what you highlight > > above is designed behavior. What is happening is covered by my second > > rule of life 'Easy is difficult'. In this case it is the desire for a > > built in 'packaging' system that makes extending Postgres easier for the > > end user. To get that leads to more complexity in the backend and a new > > learning curve for those that have to deal with it. > > not sure what "learning curve" you have in mind, since it simply > cripples functionality of pg_dump. > how steep is the learning curve, to learn that you no longer can make > sensible "pg_dump -s"? I am not sure I understand crippled. There is a bug that you acknowledge has been dealt with. The rest is documented behavior having to do with extension packaging. Extensions exist as packages and are put into the database and pulled from the database as such, by the extension mechanism. Whether data is included in that process is up to the discretion of the extension creator. So on that particular point you probably need to talk to the folks that created the extension. The learning curve exists because now a db admin has to understand that the extension mechanism exists and the ways it interacts with the rest of the database. > > Best regards, > > depesz -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxx -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
