Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 02:07:40PM -0800, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> Finally dawned on me. When you use 'at time zone' on a timestamp
> with tz it strips the tz which then allows the value to be indexed
> because:
> 
> -[ RECORD 5 ]-------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Schema              | pg_catalog
> Name                | date_part
> Result data type    | double precision
> Argument data types | text, timestamp without time zone
> Type                | normal
> Volatility          | immutable
> Owner               | postgres
> Language            | internal
> Source code         | timestamp_part
> Description         | extract field from timestamp

yes, but it is not correct - the value is actually stable, and not
immutable.

Best regards,

depesz

-- 
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
                                                             http://depesz.com/

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux