hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > anyway - the point is that in \df date_part(, timestamp) says it's > immutable, while it is not. Hmm, you're right. I thought we'd fixed that way back when, but obviously not. Or maybe the current behavior of the epoch case postdates that. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
