Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Is Synchronous Postgresql Replication Slower Than Asynchronous?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20 January 2012 21:53, Jerry Richards <jerry.richards@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I noticed there are several synchronous implementations (Postgre-XC, PGCluster, pgpool, rubyrep, built-in streaming, etc.).  When you say, " you can dynamically change that right down to the transaction level...", are you referring specifically to one of these implementations?

I refer specifically to the synchronous replication feature that was
introduced into PostgreSQL itself, in the current 9.1 release:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/warm-standby.html#SYNCHRONOUS-REPLICATION

-- 
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux